Now Reading
‘Still Star-Crossed’ answers its questions too soon in “Pluck Out the Heart of My Mystery”

‘Still Star-Crossed’ answers its questions too soon in “Pluck Out the Heart of My Mystery”

By Chelsea Hensley

Maybe it was the mini hiatus or Still Star-Crossed’s cancellation, but I wasn’t much looking forward to “Pluck Out the Heart of My Mystery.” The previous episode had its moments but wasn’t as strong as I wanted, but this one pretty much confirms that, despite how annoying it may be, this show’s cancellation isn’t unwarranted. But it should be a much better final product than it is, with so many experienced people (including Shonda Rhimes and Betsy Beers) behind the scenes. But my biggest question about the show is why it’s trying to cram so much story into a mere seven episodes?

Still Star-Crossed would have benefitted from going the same straightforward route as the source material, but it’s being weighed down by dull subplots.  The central arc of Rosaline and Benvolio reluctantly partnering to figure out who’s attacking their families is being overtaken by weaker plots like Escalus and Isabella’s efforts to avoid conflict with Venice, Lady Capulet’s determined hatred of Rosaline, and the arrival of Tessa Montague. The only thing that manages to be even somewhat interesting is the cold open, as a cat snoops around Juliet’s bedroom/shrine, knocking over a vial of poison and drinking it. Later, this same cat reawakens and leaps out of its grave as if nothing ever happened.

But that’s where the intrigue in this episode begins and ends because the rest of the episode is pretty set on sapping any and all tension. Unfortunately, the show’s not quite smart enough to lean into the conspiracies and entrapments like it wants to, so its attempts often fall flat.

Take Rosaline and Benvolio’s investigation which leads them to Grimio Capulet and a masked swordsman who kills Grimio and pins his murder on Benvolio. This isn’t CSI: Verona, so I don’t expect any murder investigation to be as thorough as we’ve grown accustomed to on our TV, but I can’t fathom how anyone is so quick to take the word of a single witness against another single witness. Especially when that one witness is a common woman (let’s be real, no one would have listened to or believed her testimony against a noble) who didn’t even see the actual killing happen. Granted, we already know Escalus isn’t big on investigations himself with the whole “executions without a trial” thing, but….really?

I can’t fault the show for wanting to pick up the pace when it only has a little more time to finish up, but that’s no excuse for being so sloppy about it. After becoming Verona’s Most Wanted, Benvolio plans to leave with his sex worker friend. Listening to him profess his love for her is cringeworthy enough, because I can’t fathom why he feels that way, but it’s a relief when she turns him in instead. Why would she, paid to be in his company, want to take off with him for an uncertain life on the run? But I appreciate her pointing out to him that he’s a client and like all the rest, is of course in love with her. It’s not a good look for Benvolio, thinking that he’s so singularly charming as to convince a woman that he’s her one and only, but Benvolio’s clearly hard up for friends and acquaintances.

So I get why he goes from “hating” Rosaline to standing outside her window asking her to run away with him and find the truth. Of course, he’d be convinced of Rosaline’s innate goodness after learning of her father’s murder and how much she despises the cyclical nature of all their feuding. But I’m not as sold as Rosaline’s trust in him since Benvolio didn’t get much of an opportunity this week to present a different side of himself like she did. But then again, Rosaline is a good person so… of course she wants to clear Benvolio’s name and find out who’s really behind everything. Who knows how long it’ll take them to figure it out but since we already know the answer it’s not going to as interesting as it should be.

It’s not a shock that Paris and Lady Capulet are working together to wreak havoc, but it’s still disappointing to have it laid out so soon.The book at least attempted to create an engaging mystery (not that it did a very good job, if you ask me), but the show was quick to abandon it. Not only does Lady Capulet spends the whole episode seething (it was a lot this week), but we get a single scene of Paris not in villain mode and he’s far too transparent in his questioning of Livia to not be up to something. Would it have been too much to ask that we get to play around with more clues and questions before having it solved for us?

At least the episode’s title is well earned. The heart of the mystery has indeed been plucked.

Stray Observations

  • Is no one going to tell us the cat’s name?
  • I’m not at all interested in Tessa Montague, and I’m questioning her inclusion so far. It’s not like she’s contributing something new. Isabella would have functioned just as well as an ambitious, manipulative female character, so why are we now being asked to care about Lord Montague’s sister this late in the game? And if she’s staying in Verona and Isabella is leaving for Venice, does this mean they’re essentially swapping places?
  • So who put the poison back in Juliet’s bedroom anyway? It wasn’t Rosaline so was it the Friar? And how would he have gotten in there?
  • The Friar is going straight to hell probably.
  • Escalus had one good moment this episode (punching the ambassador who suggested he pimp out Isabella) and he quickly squandered it by being weird with Rosaline.

Chelsea A. HensleyChelsea A. Hensley is a writer and blogger who recently received a BA in English from the University of Missouri. Besides television, she also loves chocolate chip cookies, puppies, and Dragon Age. In between episodes of her favorite shows, Chelsea’s hard at work on a young adult novel. You can read more of her writing on The Chelsea Review and follow her on Twitter @ChelseaBigBang.

D23 Wows and Amazes Disney Fans with Sneak Peaks at Shows, Films, and Parks
What's Your Reaction?
In Love
Not Sure
View Comment (1)
  • My issue with the show, is that its having the characters follow a romance template typical in foreign dramas. It’s very obvious.

    Two characters hate each other and are forced to share space together. Then comes the realization that the other is a “person” via an act or gesture, then comes the mutual respect/friendship brought about by another act that benefits one over the other.

    Then a circumstance where one develops “hidden” feelings that they will immediately reject for the other person but hide them because it usually comes from a rebound from a past tragedy.

    Then give in to an act that is selfless for the other person, thereby exploding into actual emotions (love) whether hidden or outwardly expressed.

    The larger question is would the other person, who will go through this same progression, go at the same pace, or will their confession of emotion be at some grand gesture to either save the other person’s life or reputation.

    I agree, the show should have made itself smaller and focused on the actual families and not this mystery stuff. Its a character study, but we don’t know much about them as people other than the acts they do. Its very hollow, and predictable.

    Its a shame because the two leads actually have decent chemistry when they are not burdened with trite dialogue (the scene where he follows her to her old house was so heavy handed).

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll To Top